Ex 6.1, 1 In triangle PQR, D is the midpoint of QR. PM is
Triangle Pqr Was Transformed. To be congruent there must not be any dilation. Which describes how triangle pqr could have been transformed?
Ex 6.1, 1 In triangle PQR, D is the midpoint of QR. PM is
Translated 2 units down and dilated by a scale factor of 3/2 c. Which describes how triangle pqr could have been transformed: Repeat the steps for point b to get b'. The scale factor of dilation is: Extend the line ca to the point a’ such that ca’ = 3ca. Which describes how triangle pqr could have been transformed? Web triangle pqr is transformed to similar triangle p′q′r′: Web enlarge triangle abc with c as the center of dilation and a scale factor of 3. This means that the angles and the proportion between sizes will be the same, but the length are scaled by 1/4, and the area is consequentially scaled by 1/16. So we have four different sequences of transformations, and so why don't you pause this video and figure out which of these actually does map triangle pqr, so this is pqr, onto abc, and it could be more than one of these.
Which describes how triangle pqr could have been transformed? Web 25 in the diagram below, right triangle pqr is transformed by a sequence of rigid motions that maps it onto right triangle nml. Translated 2 units down and dilated by a scale factor of 3/2 c. This means that the angles and the proportion between sizes will be the same, but the length are scaled by 1/4, and the area is consequentially scaled by 1/16. Web which of the following sequences of transformations maps triangle pqr onto triangle abc? A coordinate plane is shown. To be congruent there must not be any dilation. The scale factor of dilation is: Q pm l n r score 2: Web the triangles are similar, but not congruent. Expert answer previous question next question
